|

楼主 |
发表于 2023-7-14 10:43:27
|
显示全部楼层
来自 日本
佛陀结束了转世循环,继续着自己的发展
1971年5月18日的ESP3课程
([Ron:] “Within this system of meditation you talked about the creative vitality and the creative energy, that the idea of the end goal is the identity of the source of All That Is …what is Buddha doing now?”)
([罗恩:]"在这个冥想系统中,你谈到了创造性的活力和创造性的能量,认为最终目标的想法是对所有事物的源头的认同......佛陀现在在做什么?")
He is now in another sphere of activity. He is not in the reincarnational cycle. No one continues in the reincarnational cycle forever. He is continuing his own development.
他现在是在另一个活动领域。他不在转世循环中。没有人永远在转世循环中继续。佛陀在继续自己的发展。
......
The Buddha came closer. They are very close, however, in comparison with other religions in that they at least accepted the possibility that all things were a portion of vitality and life. They simply got mixed up with their endings.
佛陀更加接近(真相)。与其他宗教相比,他们非常接近,因为他们至少接受了“万物都是生命力和生命的一部分”的可能性。他们(佛教徒?)他们只是把结局搞混了。
([Ron:] “There is also the [Asian deity-name lost] He has attained nirvana, but he stays around and helps people who are still in the reincarnational cycle.”)
([Ron:]"还有一个[亚洲神名丢失]他已经获得了涅槃,但他留在附近,帮助那些还在转世循环中的人。")
Now he is a psychic entity and as such he is a valid reality, as Christ is, and you can all study that sentence. It is loaded.
现在他是一个灵性存有,因此他是一个有效的实相,就像基督一样,你们都可以琢磨这句话,这句话有内容。
([Ron:] “Then there is no return to the Godhead.”)
([Ron:]"那么就没有回到神性。")
I did not say that. I said you never lost your individuality.
我没有这么说。我说你从未失去你的个人性。
([Ron:] “Then not everyone could return to the Godhead if the Godhead is conceived as an energy state.”)
([Ron:]"那麼,如果神性被構想為一種能量狀態,就不是每個人都可以回到神性。")。
Why could not an energy state also be composed of individual identities? Why must it be some blah? Why can it not be a psychic gestalt? Now, wait.
为什么一个能量状态不能也由个体身份组成?为什么它必须是一些没有意义的废话?为什么它不能是一个灵性的集成整体?
|
|