“杀戮”的观念在根上就错了，死去的敌人会造成更大伤害

四十不惑的春风

早期课4， 第182节，赛斯文化出版社

【至于文明人不该杀戮这件事，赛斯说，打从一开始关于“杀戮”的整个观念就是错的：“已死”的敌人远比活着的敌人更会造成危害。赛斯在此重申“所有的意识基本上都是一体的”这一观念。他再一次说，杀戮本身在其他层面中并不被视为结束。可是在我们的层面，如果我们真的把它当成是一种结束，然后去杀戮，那就是犯错。

(Speaking of the fact that civilized man should not kill, Seth said the whole idea of killing is fallacious to begin with: an enemy who is “dead" is far more harmful than one who is still alive.Here he was dealing with the basic unity of all consciousness again.Killing is not thought of as an end in itself on other
planes, he repeated.But it is wrong to kill on our plane when we do consider it an end. 】

四十不惑的春风

出处同上：

赛斯说，目前人类的行为已经导向毁灭，而非生存之路。赛斯重复说了好几次，对文明人来说，杀戮是不对的。从林里的动物为了食物而杀戮是一回事，为了杀戮而杀戮又是另一回事。野生动物杀戮时，被杀的动物在自然界的架构中被取代了，这中间并没有缺口，大自然的平衡得以维持。当人类杀人时，他等于撕毁掉那个他创造出来的一部分自己。如果人类了解这一点，也知道死亡不是结束，而是一种形式的转变，就不会再杀人了。

So far man’s behavior has him headed for destruction rather than survival.Seth repeated several times that for civilized man to kill is wrong.An animal in the jungle killing for food is one thing. To kill for the sake of killing is another.When a wild animal kills, the killed is replaced in the natural scheme of things. No gap is left, and the balance of nature is
maintained.When man kills he rips out a part of himself that he has created.Man will stop killing when he realizes this, and that death is not an ending but a change of form.